Press TV English language Tehran based channel
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4squbd-aWa7uA8c_TxNSHA/videos
WWIII provocation, Press TV rolling Solemaini
funeral coverage, Syed Abbas, Tony Gosling
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RstgeGYJUPw
The reason Qassem Soleimani was in Baghdad shows how complex the Iran crisis is
The commander is said to have been in Iraq to
discuss moves to ease tensions between Tehran and
Saudi Arabia – something that will have been of interest to Washington
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=179625#179625
Kim Sengupta 4 hours ago
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/qassem-soleimani-death-iran-baghdad-middle-east-iraq-saudi-arabia-a9272901.html
As part of the incendiary and escalating crisis
surrounding the assassination of Qassem
Soleimani, there has come an explanation of why
the Iranian commander was actually in Baghdad
when he was targeted by a US missile strike.
Iraq’s prime minister revealed that he was due to
be meeting the Iranian commander to discuss moves
being made to ease the confrontation between Shia
Iran and Sunni Saudi Arabia – the crux of so much
of strife in the Middle East and beyond.
Adil Abdul-Mahdi was quite clear: “I was supposed
to meet him in the morning the day he was killed,
he came to deliver a message from Iran in
response to the message we had delivered from the Saudis to Iran.”
The prime minister also disclosed that Donald
Trump had called him to ask him to mediate
following the attack on the US embassy in
Baghdad. According to Iraqi officials contact was
made with a number of militias as well as figures
in Tehran. The siege of the embassy was lifted
and the US president personally thanked Abdul-Mahdi for his help.
There was nothing to suggest to the Iraqis that
it was unsafe for Soleimani to travel to Baghdad
– quite the contrary. This suggests that Trump
helped lure the Iranian commander to a place
where he could be killed. It is possible that the
president was unaware of the crucial role that
Soleimani was playing in the attempted
rapprochement with the Saudis. Or that he knew but did not care.
One may even say that it is not in the interest
of a president who puts so much emphasis on
American arms exports, and whose first official
trip after coming to office was a weapons-selling
trip to Saudi Arabia – during which he railed
against Iran – to have peace break out between
the Iranians and the kingdom. But that would be far too cynical a thought.
Abdul-Mahdi spoke of his disappointment that
while Trump was expressing his gratitude over the
mediation, he was also simultaneously planning an
attack on Soleimani. That attack took place not
long after the telephone call from the president.
There is also the possibility that the US
military planners knew nothing about the
conversations between Trump and Abdul-Mahdi, and
took out Soleimani when the opportunity presented itself.
There may be credence to this, if one follows the
narrative which is emerging from defence and
intelligence officials in Washington: that the
assassination option presented to Trump was bound
to be refused, as it had been by his predecessors
in the White House. And that there was a
desperate scramble to track down Soleimani when,
much to their shock, Trump ordered the hit.
The existence of the talks between the Saudi and
the Iranians and, more importantly, the threat of
impending violence, has meant reaction in Riyadh
at the killing has been markedly muted.
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, not a stranger
to sabre rattling, has sent his younger brother,
deputy defence minister Khalid bin Salman, to Washington to urge restraint.
The very real risk of the region becoming an
arena for conflict has led to rare cooperation in
the stand-off between the Saudi-led Gulf block
and Qatar, whose foreign minister was dispatched
to Tehran with a similar appeal for calm.
In Tehran, Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani met
with Iranian president Hassan Rouhani to discuss
“measures to maintain the security and stability
of the region,” the state-run Qatar News Agency
reported. While in the UAE the foreign minister,
Anwar Gargash, called for “rational engagement”,
tweeting: “wisdom and balance must prevail.”
As well as being in danger of getting caught in
the crossfire of a war between the US and Iran,
the Arab states in the region are vulnerable to
Tehran’s allied militias – in Lebanon, Yemen,
Iraq and Syria. There is concern whether the US,
after unleashing a wave of missiles, would do
anything when retribution is taken on its partner countries.
The Saudis learned only too clearly last summer
that one cannot always depend on American
commitment, when drone and missile attacks on
oil-processing facilities in the kingdom halved
oil production. Trump directly blamed Iran for
the attacks but there was no American military
response, just as there has not been to the many
attacks on the kingdom from the Houthis in Yemen.
In the light of all this Khalid al-Dakhil, a
Saudi political sociologist, pointed out: “Saudi
Arabia and all the Gulf countries are just quiet.
They don’t want to antagonise the Iranians,
because the situation in the region is so
delicate, so divided, so sensitive, that you don’t want to stir it up further.”
Robert Emerson, a British security analyst, said
that it was clear why caution was prevailing.
“You don’t know whether Trump will just light the
blue touchpaper and then just disappear,” he
said. “The Arab states are right to be wary. The
talk about Iran and Saudi negotiations is
intriguing, further details should be emerging.’’
The Trump administration continues to insist that
Soleimani was killed because he was about to
launch an imminent terror campaign, without
providing any evidence for the assertion. There
is increasing scepticism about the claim and the
questions are not going to go away. There are too
many memories of Saddam Hussein and his
non-existent WMD arsenal. The repercussions from
the assassination in Baghdad will continue for a very long time.
NB please do reply with remove as the subject or
first line if you do not wish to recieve further emails - thanks
'From South America, where payment must be made
with subtlety, the Bormann organization has made
a substantial contribution. It has drawn many of
the brightest Jewish businessmen into a
participatory role in the development of many of
its corporations, and many of these Jews share
their prosperity most generously with Israel. If
their proposals are sound, they are even provided
with a specially dispensed venture capital fund.
I spoke with one Jewish businessmen in Hartford,
Connecticut. He had arrived there quite unknown
several years before our conversation, but with
Bormann money as his leverage. Today he is more
than a millionaire, a quiet leader in the
community with a certain share of his profits
earmarked as always for his venture capital
benefactors. This has taken place in many other
instances across America and demonstrates how
Bormann’s people operate in the contemporary
commercial world, in contrast to the fanciful
nonsense with which Nazis are described in so much “literature.”
So much emphasis is placed on select Jewish
participation in Bormann companies that when
Adolf Eichmann was seized and taken to Tel Aviv
to stand trial, it produced a shock wave in the
Jewish and German communities of Buenos Aires.
Jewish leaders informed the Israeli authorities
in no uncertain terms that this must never happen
again because a repetition would permanently
rupture relations with the Germans of Latin
America, as well as with the Bormann
organization, and cut off the flow of Jewish
money to Israel. It never happened again, and the
pursuit of Bormann quieted down at the request of
these Jewish leaders. He is residing in an
Argentinian safe haven, protected by the most
efficient German infrastructure in history as
well as by all those whose prosperity depends on his well-being.'
<http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fspitfirelist.com%2Fbooks%2Fmartin-bormann-nazi-in-exile%2F&h=eAQErj17O>http<http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fspitfirelist.com%2Fbooks%2Fmartin-bormann-nazi-in-exile%2F&h=eAQErj17O>://spitfirelist.com/books/martin-bormann-nazi-in-exile/
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://www.thisweek.org.uk
http://www.911forum.org.uk
http://www.bilderberg.org
http://www.tlio.org.uk
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvPbHiqhLtpNWA_cg_1NULw
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMn9GM4atN3t7AHJBbHMR0Q
https://www.twitter.com/TonyGosling
https://www.facebook.com/tony.gosling.16
You can donate to support Tony's work here http://www.bilderberg.org/bcfm.htm
TG mobile +44 7786 952037
--
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political power they wield?
There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual leaders/dudes.
To post to this group, send email to pepis@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pepis-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PEPIS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to pepis+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pepis/7.0.1.0.1.20200107215651.0215e278%40cultureshop.org.uk.
