PS, I know this can be managed by using processor sets and binding, I'm
just trying to understand the defaults...
  As requested:

# /usr/sbin/prtdiag

System Configuration:  Sun Microsystems  sun4u Sun Fire V1280
System clock frequency: 150 MHz
Memory size: 57344 Megabytes

========================= CPUs =========================

                    Run   Ecache   CPU    CPU
Brd  CPU   Module   MHz     MB    Impl.   Mask
---  ---  -------  -----  ------  ------  ----
 0     0     0      900     8.0   US-III+   2.3
 0     1     1      900     8.0   US-III+   2.3
 0     2     2      900     8.0   US-III+   2.3
 0     3     3      900     8.0   US-III+   2.3
 0     8     8      900     8.0   US-III+   2.3
 0     9     9      900     8.0   US-III+   2.3
 0    10    10      900     8.0   US-III+   2.3
 0    11    11      900     8.0   US-III+   2.3
 0    16    16      900     8.0   US-III+   2.3
 0    17    17      900     8.0   US-III+   2.3
 0    18    18      900     8.0   US-III+   2.3
 0    19    19      900     8.0   US-III+   2.3


========================= IO Cards =========================

# cfgadm -av       
Ap_Id                          Receptacle   Occupant     Condition
Information
When         Type         Busy     Phys_Id
N0.IB6                         connected    configured   ok
powered-on, assigned
Aug 31 16:51 PCI_I/O_Boa  n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.IB6
N0.IB6::pci0                   connected    configured   ok
device /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],700000, referenced
Aug 31 16:51 io           n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.IB6::pci0
N0.IB6::pci1                   connected    configured   ok
device /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],600000, referenced
Aug 31 16:51 io           n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.IB6::pci1
N0.IB6::pci2                   connected    configured   ok
device /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],700000
Aug 31 16:51 io           n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.IB6::pci2
N0.IB6::pci3                   connected    configured   ok
device /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],600000, referenced
Aug 31 16:51 io           n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.IB6::pci3
N0.SB0                         connected    configured   ok
powered-on, assigned
Aug 31 16:51 CPU          n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.SB0
N0.SB0::cpu0                   connected    configured   ok
cpuid 0, speed 900 MHz, ecache 8 MBytes
Aug 31 16:51 cpu          n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.SB0::cpu0
N0.SB0::cpu1                   connected    configured   ok
cpuid 1, speed 900 MHz, ecache 8 MBytes
Aug 31 16:51 cpu          n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.SB0::cpu1
N0.SB0::cpu2                   connected    configured   ok
cpuid 2, speed 900 MHz, ecache 8 MBytes
Aug 31 16:51 cpu          n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.SB0::cpu2
N0.SB0::cpu3                   connected    configured   ok
cpuid 3, speed 900 MHz, ecache 8 MBytes
Aug 31 16:51 cpu          n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.SB0::cpu3
N0.SB0::memory                 connected    configured   ok         base
address 0x0, 33554432 KBytes total, 1768104 KBytes permanent
Aug 31 16:51 memory       n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.SB0::memory
N0.SB2                         connected    configured   ok
powered-on, assigned
Aug 31 16:51 CPU          n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.SB2
N0.SB2::cpu0                   connected    configured   ok
cpuid 8, speed 900 MHz, ecache 8 MBytes
Aug 31 16:51 cpu          n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.SB2::cpu0
N0.SB2::cpu1                   connected    configured   ok
cpuid 9, speed 900 MHz, ecache 8 MBytes
Aug 31 16:51 cpu          n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.SB2::cpu1
N0.SB2::cpu2                   connected    configured   ok
cpuid 10, speed 900 MHz, ecache 8 MBytes
Aug 31 16:51 cpu          n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.SB2::cpu2
N0.SB2::cpu3                   connected    configured   ok
cpuid 11, speed 900 MHz, ecache 8 MBytes
Aug 31 16:51 cpu          n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.SB2::cpu3
N0.SB2::memory                 connected    configured   ok         base
address 0x2000000000, 16777216 KBytes total
Aug 31 16:51 memory       n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.SB2::memory
N0.SB4                         connected    configured   ok
powered-on, assigned
Aug 31 16:51 CPU          n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.SB4
N0.SB4::cpu0                   connected    configured   ok
cpuid 16, speed 900 MHz, ecache 8 MBytes
Aug 31 16:51 cpu          n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.SB4::cpu0
N0.SB4::cpu1                   connected    configured   ok
cpuid 17, speed 900 MHz, ecache 8 MBytes
Aug 31 16:51 cpu          n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.SB4::cpu1
N0.SB4::cpu2                   connected    configured   ok
cpuid 18, speed 900 MHz, ecache 8 MBytes
Aug 31 16:51 cpu          n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.SB4::cpu2
N0.SB4::cpu3                   connected    configured   ok
cpuid 19, speed 900 MHz, ecache 8 MBytes
Aug 31 16:51 cpu          n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.SB4::cpu3
N0.SB4::memory                 connected    configured   ok         base
address 0x4000000000, 8388608 KBytes total
Aug 31 16:51 memory       n        /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:N0.SB4::memory
c1                             connected    configured   unknown
unavailable  scsi-bus     n
/devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],600000/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:scsi
c1::dsk/c1t0d0                 connected    configured   unknown
FUJITSU MAN3367M SUN36G
unavailable  disk         n
/devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],600000/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]:scsi::dsk/c1t0d0 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sherry Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 4:47 PM
> To: David McDaniel (damcdani)
> Cc: perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: Re: [perf-discuss] Puzzling scheduler behavior
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> I have a theory.  But before I present it, I would like a bit 
> more information.
> 
>     - Output of "/usr/sbin/prtdiag"
>     - If it is a Sun Fire, the output of "cfgadm -av"
> 
> Thanks,
> Sherry
> 
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 02:13:47PM -0700, David McDaniel wrote:
> > Our application consists of multiple cooperating 
> multithreaded processes. The application is both latency and 
> throughput sensitive. Since it originated long ago, several 
> artifacts are less than optimal, but thats the way it is for 
> awhile longer. Anyway, I digress. Most threads run in the TS 
> class with boosted "nice" values so as to limit the possible 
> interference from the the occasional background task; the 
> exceptions are a few very lightweight, infrequent, but urgent 
> ones that run in the RT class. Additionally, hires tick is 
> set. As a result, the default rechoose_interval period is 3ms 
> rather than the normal 30ms.
> >   The curious thing is that on a 12 cpu system I can 
> observe that some cpus are much busier than others, and 
> latency as observed via prstat -Lm is higher than expected on 
> a lightly loaded system. I presume this is an artifact of 
> threads queueing up for rechoose_interval on the last cpu 
> they ran on instead of migrating. This seems to be born out 
> by the fact that I can use psrset to create a set containing 
> one of the otherwise idle cpus, bind a process to it, then 
> delete the processor set and see that the previously bound 
> process appears to stick on the previously idle cpu. OK, so 
> far, but the other processes still seem to be contending for 
> busy cpus, which is inoptimal for our application.
> >   Now comes the real puzzler, to me at least. I set 
> rechoose_interval=0 in /etc/system, reboot, take it from the 
> top. I though this would result in the load being spread out 
> over time as threads migrated to and then stuck to 
> uncontended cpus, but thats not what I see. Here is mpstat snapshot:
> > CPU minf mjf xcal  intr ithr  csw icsw migr smtx  srw syscl 
>  usr sys  wt idl
> >   0    14    0   211  2976 1957 2245   84  375  156    0 
> 20874   17   9   0  74
> >   1     0     0   149    98    2 2612   89  583   73    0 
> 19032   16  11   0  73
> >   2   12     0   184    86    6 2523   76  589   76    0 
> 17215   13   9   0  77
> >   3     0     0    96   650  581 2387   64  530   85    0 
> 13249   11   7   0  82
> >   8   56     0    11     6    1  581    2  227   25    0  
> 1401    2   2   0  97
> >   9     0     0     6     4    1  550    0  111    8    0   
> 398    1   1   0  98
> >  10    5     0     8    28   25  546    0   44   14    0   
> 165    0   1   0  99
> >  11    0     0   16   390  388  219    0   23   18    0    
> 75    0   1   0  99
> >  16  52     0   13    10    7  223    1   22    5    0   
> 212    0   1   0  99
> >  17    0     0    5     4    1  322    0   34    5    0   
> 525    0   1   0  99
> >  18    0     0   15     5    1  319    1   86   11    0  
> 1558    1   1   0  98
> >  19    1     0   50     8    1  552    4  192   22    0  
> 4406    4   2   0  94
> > 
> >   Any thoughts?
> > This message posted from opensolaris.org 
> > _______________________________________________
> > perf-discuss mailing list
> > perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
> 
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], Solaris Kernel Development, 
> http://blogs.sun.com/sherrym
> 
_______________________________________________
perf-discuss mailing list
perf-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to