On Jul 10, 2007, at 1:57 PM, Alexander Kolbasov wrote: > I'd like to modify my initial proposal and suggest to create a "CPU > Observability" project with the goal of providing good abstraction and > tools for CPU-related observability. > > As for the exact mechanism being used - the filesystem, programmatic > API, kstat extensions or some combination of these - it can be > explored > by project participants.
Well, you got this discussion off the ground with your proposal for CPUfs... As for a companion interface, what would the opinions be for a companion ABI which returns name-value pairs, a la libdiskmgt (granted, libdiskmgt itself is not Public... it could/should be though)? /dale _______________________________________________ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
