"Richard L. Hamilton" wrote:
[snip]
> > This email and any files transmitted with it are
> > confidential and intended solely for the use of the
> > individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If
> > you have received this email in error please notify
> > the system manager. This message contains
> > confidential information and is intended only for the
> > individual named. If you are not the named addressee
> > you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this
> > e-mail.
> 
> >From my point of view, function-call-like APIs that deal with binary
> data, preferably available in both C and perl (the latter for those for
> whom everything has to be some sort of script), are preferable to
> new _text_ pseudo files that then need to be parsed from text back to
> something machine readable, which for particularly _human_ readable
> formats, may not be both efficient and unambiguous.
> (along those lines, it would be handy if there were a ksh93 extension
> that could map C data structures to ksh93 nested variables (using
> the API for the memory model of the ksh93 binary), not unlike what can
> be done for perl like that)

BTW: Is there any exiting functionality ? If it isn't too big I can
"manually" write some bindings for ksh93 (e.g. if there is any interest
please subscribe me to the project list and make a draft which
functionality you need (I already did similar work with the "poll"
builtin (which works like poll(2) from the shell level) for someone else
within Sun...) ...) ...
         
----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
 (;O/ \/ \O;)
_______________________________________________
perf-discuss mailing list
perf-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to