On Fri 05 Oct 2007 at 03:04PM, Spencer Shepler wrote:
>
> On Oct 5, 2007, at 2:55 PM, Ben Rockwood wrote:
>
> > Spencer Shepler wrote:
> >>
> >> On Oct 5, 2007, at 2:14 PM, Ben Rockwood wrote:
> >>
> >>> Looks like some files are missing from the distribution. Is this
> >>> what was meant by: "Makefile cleanup needs to be done for stand-
> >>> alone builds for OpenSolaris, Linux, and OS/X, etc." ?
> >>
> >> Yes. For expediency of getting the source onto sourceforge, I pulled
> >> directly from the OpenSolaris source tree. We need to get makefiles
> >> created and cleaned up for the various environments.
> >>
> >> The big picture plan is to keep filebench.sourceforge.net as the
> >> mainline source and pull OpenSolaris specifics into OpenSolaris.
That seems to be at odds with the recent checkin, to me. Why check the
source for filebench into ON when presumably I can't go and alter the
source via ON? It sounds like I'd have to contribute the source to the
upstream repository on sourceforge.
It seems to me that:
- As Ben says, this should be autoconf-driven if it is to
be multiplatform
- It's a more natural fit for the SFW consolidation than OS/Net,
since SFW is oriented around taking source provided from
upstream providers and doing ./configure && make && make install.
It's weird to me that this project would be doing this seemingly in the
reverse order given your stated big picture...
-dp
--
Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - blogs.sun.com/dp
_______________________________________________
perf-discuss mailing list
perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
