I am the wrong person to do such an investigation - I am no Solaris kernel internals expert.
Olga 2010/7/14 Bart Smaalders <bart.smaald...@oracle.com>: > On 07/13/10 17:14, ольга крыжановская wrote: >> >> Nicolas, I know that posix_spawn exists now in Solaris. >> But I measured that it has no benefit over the traditional vfork and >> exec sequence of calls, but the authors of posix_spawn designed it to >> be an improvement if *implemented* in the kernel. The lack of >> performance difference between posix_spawn and vfork,exec and the >> *very* bad performance of vfork,exec on Solaris - compared to Linux on >> the same hardware, where 2.6.25.20-0.5-default can spawn utilities al >> most 70% faster than Opensolaris B134 - has lead to my request to find >> some one to try and improve the situation. >> > > What does DTrace tell you about where the time is being spent? > Instead of asserting where the problem is in email, how about > doing some investigation? > > - Bart > > > -- > Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance > bart.smaald...@oracle.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts > "You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird." > -- , _ _ , { \/`o;====- Olga Kryzhanovska -====;o`\/ } .----'-/`-/ olga.kryzhanov...@gmail.com \-`\-'----. `'-..-| / http://twitter.com/fleyta \ |-..-'` /\/\ Solaris/BSD//C/C++ programmer /\/\ `--` `--` _______________________________________________ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
