On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 09:26:14AM -0800, SeongJae Park wrote:
> formalregress.tex is using mixed use of SEL4 and seL4.  SEL4 is used 8
> times, while seL4 is used twice over the entire repository.  Use SEL4
> for the consistency.  Note that use of seL4 in swtools.bib is not
> changed by this commit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <[email protected]>

Nice, thank you!

I queued and pushed all but this one.  Their website [1] says seL4.
At least I *think* that this is their website.

Either way, I agree that this should be consistent with their naming.

On the Promela/spin change, should a similar change be applied in the
Formal Verification chapter?

                                                        Thanx, Paul

[1] https://sel4.systems/

> ---
>  future/formalregress.tex | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/future/formalregress.tex b/future/formalregress.tex
> index b1a39b29..40bf2b35 100644
> --- a/future/formalregress.tex
> +++ b/future/formalregress.tex
> @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ so they are all yellow with question marks.
>       Indeed there are!
>       This table focuses on those that Paul has used, but others are
>       proving to be useful.
> -     Formal verification has been heavily used in the seL4
> +     Formal verification has been heavily used in the SEL4
>       project~\cite{ThomasSewell2013L4binaryVerification},
>       and its tools can now handle modest levels of concurrency.
>       More recently, Catalin Marinas used Lamport's
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
> 

Reply via email to