On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 08:15:22PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> On 2024/01/24 1:51, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:58:24PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> >> The use \columnwidth results in too large figures in -1c and -eb
> >> builds. Instead, use \twocolumwidth (\columnwidth of 2c build) and
> >> make them more or less similarly scaled.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <[email protected]>
> >
> > Queued, thank you! And at some point, I should learn that \twocolumnwidth
> > is *not* the width of both columns. ;-)
>
> That would be \twocolumntextwidth.
>
> Yes, those namings (by me) are confusing.
>
> How about calling \twocolumnwidth as \columnwidthofTwoCol,
> \onecolumntextwidth as \textwidthofOneCol, and
> \twocolumntextwidth as \textwidthofTwoCol ?
>
> I'd love to use "1c" and "2c" in these names, but numbers are
> not allowed in command names of LaTeX.
I cannot think of a short name that would not be confusing. :-(
So it is probably best for me to get myself used to the current name.
Thanx, Paul
