Hi Paul,

Current master at commit b8bdf71fbc31 ("glossary: Add definitions of the
flavors of multi-copy atomic") has new definitions of:

    - Multi-Copy Atomic
    - Non-Multi-Copy Atomic
    - Other Multi-Copy Atomic

Not a big deal, but do you mind if I changed the latter to
"Other-Multi-Copy Atomic"?

I'm asking because the Index pages now have these terms:

    - Multi-copy atomic
    - Multicopy atomicity
        - full
        - non-
        - other-
    - Non-multi-copy atomic
    - Other multi-copy atomic

, which look fairly inconsistent. :-/

I think you want to say "Multi-Copy Atomic" in the glossary,
and I can tweak index markers so that above terms can be listed
simply as:

     - Multi-copy atomic
         - non-
         - other-

, and in single level indexing mode:

     - Multi-copy atomic
     - Non-multi-copy atomic
     - other-multi-copy atomic

, where "full(y) multi-copy atomic" is merged into plain
"Multi-copy atomic".

Do they look acceptable to you?

        Thanks, Akira

Reply via email to