Hey,
> Anyways, if you can encapsulate what you've done in a patch, we'd all
> appreciate it.
Here is no magic involved. As I mentioned, I just added calls to the two
functions. I did not add runtime options or any fancy stuff. However, if you
prefer a patch, you will get one :-)
--- pfmon-3.5/pfmon/pfmon_task.c 2008-07-30 23:38:23.000000000 +0200
+++ ../pfmon-3.5/pfmon/pfmon_task.c 2008-09-24 09:44:17.000000000 +0200
@@ -1564,6 +1564,8 @@
tid = sdesc->tid;
pfmon_stop(sdesc->ctxid, &error);
+ read_incremental_results(sdesc);
+ show_incr_results(sdesc, 0);
vbprintf("[%d] stopping monitoring at trigger stop\n", tid);
return 0;
}
[..]
> > > On the first glance this seems to do what I want. Any objections? :-)
> Did I miss anything?
> > >
> > If that works for you, I am fine with it. You can modify your copy of
> > pfmon anyway you like.
@Stephane: Actually the question was more like: Do I break the code in a way I
do not understand, or do you think this is valid.
However, I assume it's valid, because no one had an objection .... yet :-)
Ciao
Marc
--
GMX startet ShortView.de. Hier findest Du Leute mit Deinen Interessen!
Jetzt dabei sein: http://www.shortview.de/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
perfmon2-devel mailing list
perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel
