Thanks Stephane. Works fine.
-- Ananth On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:18 AM, stephane eranian <eran...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 2:21 AM, stephane eranian > <eran...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Ananth <ananth.nara...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Stephane, >>> I have CONFIG_X86_PERFMON_INTEL_NHM=y. So it will get built into the >>> kernel. Despite that, the right PMU module is not being loaded. I have >>> CONFIG_X86_PERFMON_INTEL_ARCH=y too. Is that causing a conflict? >> >> Should not unless I forgot to add something. Trying compiling it as module. >> > I confirm that I had forgotten to add a case for Nehalem in > perfmon_intel_arch.c. > That's why you ran into the problem. I fixed the problem in the GIT tree now. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ perfmon2-devel mailing list perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel
