> IV/ Open questions > > 1/ Support for model-specific uncore PMU monitoring capabilities > > Recent processors have multiple PMUs. Typically one per core and > but also one at the socket level, e.g., Intel Nehalem. It is > expected that this API will provide access to these PMU as well. > > It seems like with the current API, raw events for those PMU would > need a new architecture-specific type as the event encoding by > itself may not be enough to disambiguate between a core and uncore > PMU event. > > How are those events going to be supported?
(Please see our reply to II.2.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference! Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250. Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today! http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org _______________________________________________ perfmon2-devel mailing list perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel
