On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 14:37 +0200, stephane eranian wrote: > > > > > Now I was considering teaching send_sigio_to_task() to use > > specific_send_sig_info() when fown->pid != fown->group_leader->pid or > > something, but I'm not sure that won't break anything. > > > Yes, that's the problem with touching this. I don't know if this will break > things. That's why I was suggested creating a parallel code path which > does what we want without modifying the existing path. Unless you know > some signal expert at redhat or elsewhere.
His name is Oleg, and he's on CC ;-) > > Alternatively, I've missed a detail and I either read the manpage wrong, > > or the code, or both of them. > > > The code does not correspond to the manpage. Not clear which one > is correct though. This F_SETOWN trick looks very Linux specific. Linus specific sounds good enough to me. Michael might have something so say on this though... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ perfmon2-devel mailing list perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel
