On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Tanima Dey<dey_tr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> No I am using the same perfmon2 tool and in the same program I am both
> per-thread and system-wide context. Is it possible?

No it's not. But you did not tell why you think that's needed for what you want
to do. there may be another way of doing this.


> Thanks
> Tanima.
>
> ________________________________
> From: stephane eranian <eran...@googlemail.com>
> To: Tanima Dey <dey_tr...@yahoo.com>
> Cc: Perfmon <perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2009 11:47:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [perfmon2] Counters' value perthread/systemwide
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Tanima Dey<dey_tr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I got the answer to my previous question. In my case, system-wide and
>> per-thread monitoring session is not co-existent. Is it always the case? I
>> got from a documentation that such determination of co-existence is
>> possible
>> when the context is attached, not when it is created. Can anyone tell me
>> how
>> to do it?
>>
> System-wide and per-thread context cannot co-exist in the current
> implementation.
> The only reason for doing this is if you have two distinct tools
> competing for the PMU.
> Is that your case?
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
perfmon2-devel mailing list
perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel

Reply via email to