* Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 23:08 +0200, stephane eranian wrote:
>
> > But aren't you going to change the cpu, pid target stuff we
> > discussed a couple of weeks ago anyway?
>
> Right, I'd like to, but Ingo doesn't. I haven't heard back from
> Paul on this.
Not sure we want to change it. Mixing PID and CPU into the same
space disallows the simultaneous application of both. I.e. right now
we allow 3 models:
- PID-ish
- CPU-ish
- PID and CPU [say measure CPU#2 component of an inherited workload.]
Also, i dont really see the use-cases for new targets. (i've seen a
few mentioned but none seemed valid) What new targets do people have
in mind?
Ingo
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
perfmon2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel
