The validate_event() was failing on valid event
        combinations. The function was assuming that if
        x86_schedule_event() returned 0, it meant error.
        But x86_schedule_event() returns the counter index
        and 0 is a perfectly valid value. An error is returned
        if the function returns a negative value.

        Furthermore, validate_event() was also failing for
        event groups because the event->pmu was not set until
        after hw_perf_event_init().
        
        Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eran...@google.com>
--
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index bd87430..c1bbed1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -2229,10 +2229,10 @@ validate_event(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct 
perf_event *event)
 {
        struct hw_perf_event fake_event = event->hw;
 
-       if (event->pmu != &pmu)
+       if (event->pmu && event->pmu != &pmu)
                return 0;
 
-       return x86_schedule_event(cpuc, &fake_event);
+       return x86_schedule_event(cpuc, &fake_event) >= 0;
 }
 
 static int validate_group(struct perf_event *event)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
perfmon2-devel mailing list
perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel

Reply via email to