On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 18:48 +0100, stephane eranian wrote: >> So we have to modify hw_perf_enable() to first disable all events >> which are moving, >> then reprogram them. I suspect it may be possible to optimize this if >> we detect that >> those events had already been stopped individually (as opposed to >> perf_disable()), i.e., >> already had their counts saved. > > Right, I see no fundamentally impossible things at all, we just need to > be careful here. > > Anyway, I poked at the stack I've got now and it seems to hold up when I > poke at it with various combinations of constraint events, so I'll push > that off to Ingo and then we can go from there. > > Thanks for working on this!
Ok, so I think the best way to proceed here is to first wait until all of this is checked in. Then I'll see what is missing based on what we discussed here. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ perfmon2-devel mailing list perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel
