On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 12:59 -0800, eran...@google.com wrote: > Contrary to what Vol3b section 30.4.3 leads to believe, there is > no constraint on ITLB_MISS_RETIRED on Intel Core-based CPU, so > remove it.
Is that from Intel, and will they clarify the text in the next version of the document? > Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eran...@google.com> > -- > perf_event_intel.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c > b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c > index 971dc6e..58e83cd 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c > @@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ static struct event_constraint > intel_core2_event_constraints[] = > INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x18, 0x1), /* IDLE_DURING_DIV */ > INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x19, 0x2), /* DELAYED_BYPASS */ > INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xa1, 0x1), /* RS_UOPS_DISPATCH_CYCLES */ > - INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xc9, 0x1), /* ITLB_MISS_RETIRED (T30-9) */ > INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xcb, 0x1), /* MEM_LOAD_RETIRED */ > EVENT_CONSTRAINT_END > }; ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ perfmon2-devel mailing list perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel
