On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:04 PM, John Kacur <jka...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 May 2010, Stephane Eranian wrote: > >> In case the sampling buffer has no "payload" pages, nr_pages is 0. >> The problem is that the error path in perf_output_begin() skips to >> a label which assumes perf_output_lock() has been issued which is >> not the case. That triggers a WARN_ON() is perf_output_unlock(). >> >> This patch fixes the problem by adding a new label and skipping >> perf_task_unlock() in case data->nr_pages is 0. > > It does? Your code looks good to me, but the description above is > a little flawed, since no new label is added. > Sorry about that. I had written the text before the final version of the patch! I will resubmit.
>> -- >> diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c >> index a4fa381..95137b6 100644 >> --- a/kernel/perf_event.c >> +++ b/kernel/perf_event.c >> @@ -3035,8 +3035,10 @@ int perf_output_begin(struct perf_output_handle >> *handle, >> handle->nmi = nmi; >> handle->sample = sample; >> >> - if (!data->nr_pages) >> - goto fail; >> + if (!data->nr_pages) { >> + atomic_inc(&data->lost); >> + goto out; >> + } >> >> have_lost = atomic_read(&data->lost); >> if (have_lost) >> -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ perfmon2-devel mailing list perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel