Em Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 10:05:24PM +0200, Stephane Eranian escreveu: > Hi, > > You patch does seem to fix the problem.
thanks for confirming. > However, I think there may be another issue, maybe > caused by the patch. > > If you monitor a program WITHOUT buildids, and you run > > $ perf record tmp/foo > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.077 MB perf.data (~3370 samples) ] > > $ ./perf buildid-list > 86200ab2bca285344a55156a079debbbe172bcc5 [kernel.kallsyms] > > foo does not appear, yet we know it got samples. > > $ ./perf buildid-list --with-hits > 86200ab2bca285344a55156a079debbbe172bcc5 [kernel.kallsyms] > 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 /home/eranian/tmp/foo > > With the --with-hits option, I get more output than without.Supposedly > no option means 'prints all entries', including those with hits or > without buildids. Right, I noticed that too, but concentrated on fixing the problem that was clearly a bug, will add this to my TODO list as I agree this is inconsistent and/or incomplete behaviour. Will add a Tested-by: you and push it to Ingo via perf/urgent. Thanks for testing, - Arnaldo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ perfmon2-devel mailing list perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel
