2.6.33-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>

commit 4b24a88b35e15e04bd8f2c5dda65b5dc8ebca05f upstream.

If reserve_pmc_hardware() succeeds but reserve_ds_buffers()
fails, then we need to release_pmc_hardware. It won't be done
by the destroy() callback because we return before setting it
in case of error.

Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
LKML-Reference: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -1060,8 +1060,11 @@ static int __hw_perf_event_init(struct p
                if (atomic_read(&active_events) == 0) {
                        if (!reserve_pmc_hardware())
                                err = -EBUSY;
-                       else
+                       else {
                                err = reserve_bts_hardware();
+                               if (err)
+                                       release_pmc_hardware();
+                       }
                }
                if (!err)
                        atomic_inc(&active_events);



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
perfmon2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel

Reply via email to