On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:08 PM, stephane eranian
<eran...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Vince,
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Vince Weaver <vweav...@eecs.utk.edu> wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, stephane eranian wrote:
>>
>>> That's because on ARM, the _NR_perf_event_open syscall is already
>>> defined in some generic header file (I bet /usr/include/asm/unistd.h).
>>> That means I need to fix my perf_event.h to check for that before forcing
>>> a definition on its own.
>>
>> It's pulled in my /usr/include/asm/unistd.h (I'm running Debian Unstable
>> which has recent enough headers).
>>
>> What's weird is that on x86_64 the same include should pull in the
>> equivelent x86_64 header, which also has a duplicate definition, on my
>> x86_64 machines.  Somehow it doesn't though; I wasted some time
>> trying to figure out how it avoids the conflict.
>>
>> In any case, with a patch like the one at the end included, the current
>> git of libpfm4 runs fine on my ARM system.
>>
> Yes, I will push this patch ASAP.
> Thanks for the investigation.
>
Second thought on this: isn't it the case also that libc already
has the syscall stub? If so I suspect you're not getting duplicate
symbols because it is declared as weak? Or maybe I need to declare
mine as weak.

>> diff --git a/include/perfmon/perf_event.h b/include/perfmon/perf_event.h
>> index 00e2748..2100e69 100644
>> --- a/include/perfmon/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/include/perfmon/perf_event.h
>> @@ -446,6 +446,7 @@ enum perf_callchain_context {
>>  #define __NR_perf_event_open 319
>>  #endif
>>
>> +#ifndef __NR_perf_event_open
>>  #ifdef __arm__
>>  #if defined(__ARM_EABI__) || defined(__thumb__)
>>  #define __NR_perf_event_open 364
>> @@ -453,6 +454,7 @@ enum perf_callchain_context {
>>  #define __NR_perf_event_open (0x900000+364)
>>  #endif
>>  #endif
>> +#endif
>>
>>  static inline int
>>  perf_event_open(
>>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:

Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
perfmon2-devel mailing list
perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel

Reply via email to