On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 01:28:01PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote: > Fix a bug introduced with commit de725de and the change in the meaning of the > return value of intel_pmu_handle_irq(). With the current code, when you are > using the BTS, you get 'dazed by NMI' each time the BTS buffer fills up. > > BTS does interrupt on the PMU vector, thus NMI. You need to take this > into account in the return value of the function. > > This version fixes initial patch which was missing changes to > perf_event_intel_ds.c.
Great work! So does this mean my other patch that ack'd the intel pmu earlier than before is unnecessary now? Or was this patch solving a different problem? Cheers, Don ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Automate Storage Tiering Simply Optimize IT performance and efficiency through flexible, powerful, automated storage tiering capabilities. View this brief to learn how you can reduce costs and improve performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ perfmon2-devel mailing list perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel
