Hello, I have tried perfmon2 with linux-2.6.30 (from git) /as well as with perf_events linux-2.6.39 and libpfm-4.1.0 on AMD Phenom9650. Part of /proc/cpuinfo shown below:
cpu family : 16 model : 2 model name : AMD Phenom(tm) 9650 Quad-Core Processor Availability of event with umask: **** On Perfmon2 with libpfm3.9: Name : L3_CACHE_MISSES Desc : L3 Cache Misses Code : 0x4e1 Counters : [ 0 1 2 3 ] Umask-00 : 0x01 : [READ_BLOCK_EXCLUSIVE] : Read Block Exclusive (Data cache read) Umask-01 : 0x02 : [READ_BLOCK_SHARED] : Read Block Shared (Instruction cache read) Umask-02 : 0x04 : [READ_BLOCK_MODIFY] : Read Block Modify Umask-03 : 0x10 : [CORE_0_SELECT] : Core 0 Select Umask-04 : 0x20 : [CORE_1_SELECT] : Core 1 Select Umask-05 : 0x40 : [CORE_2_SELECT] : Core 2 Select Umask-06 : 0x80 : [CORE_3_SELECT] : Core 3 Select Umask-07 : 0xf7 : [ALL] : All sub-events selected **** But here use of L3_CACHE_MISSES:CORE_0_SELECT always gives 0 value. While with /perfmon2/linux-2.6.30/libpfm-3.10 as well as perf_events/linux-2.6.39/libpfm-4.1.0, I do not see umask for core selection supported. While the processor BKDG says about having such umask. Is that umask not to be used, kindly advise. Regards, Jitendra ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. Download your free trial now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ perfmon2-devel mailing list perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel
