Hi,
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Leonardo Piga <leonardo.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > I figure out the problem what the problem is. > > I am not sure if I can consider it a bug on the syst.c or I was just > making wrong assumption about its output. > > Anyway, I wrote a document explaining the problem and possibles solutions. > Something is not quite clear to me based on your paper. What do you mean by tr(i), tr(k)? Is that the value of time_enable, time_running at sample t? If so, then I don't understand the sum. time_enable, time_running represent total time since origin of measurement. At time t, you get t, at time t+1, you get t+1. But maybe I am not reading this right. > If it is actually a bug I can send my patch that samples the actual > scaled value related to the last sample instead of the value related > to the whole measurement set. > > The document can be found here: > > http://lampiao.lsc.ic.unicamp.br/~piga/misc/libpfmSystInformation.pdf > > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Leonardo Piga <leonardo.p...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am using libpfm 4.2 to measure about 15 performance counters on a >> AMD Barcelona CPU. I am able to collect 5 performance counter without >> multiplexing. >> >> However, when multiplexing I am getting "negative" delta values using >> the syst from perf_examples. >> >> Here is an example: >> >> Sample n >> "core" : 0, >> "name" : "perf::PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES", >> "val" : 131956093, >> "raw" : 62161538, >> "ena" : 1000618391, >> "run" : 471368743, >> "ratio" : 0.47, >> "delta" : 131956093 >> >> >> Sample n+1 >> "core" : 0, >> "name" : "perf::PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES", >> "val" : 118435137, >> "raw" : 63447168, >> "ena" : 2002214687, >> "run" : 1072611170, >> "ratio" : 0.54, >> "delta" : 18446744073696030660 >> >> As you can see Sample_n$val is greater than Sample_n+1$val that is why >> delta is so big (negative actually). (The raw value is growing >> though). >> >> So, I think that I am not doing the measurements in the best way. >> >> My questions are: >> >> 1)How does libpfm do the multiplexation? >> >> 2) What is the best way to multiplex 15 performance counters in time >> window of 1 second? Is there any example available with the library to >> do this? >> >> 3) What is the purpose of group (-g option on syst tool)? Can it help >> on my issue? >> >> -- >> >> Leonardo > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > perfmon2-devel mailing list > perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ perfmon2-devel mailing list perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel
