On 01/30/2013 12:29 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Will,
> 
> Ok got rid of the double close. should be limited
> to perfmon_int_wrap.c now. But that one is automatically
> generated, so there is not much I can do about it.
> 
> Thanks.

Hi Stephane,

libpfm coverity report looks pretty good at this point. There isn't much that 
can be done about the automatically generated wrapper code.

-Will
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 6:00 PM, William Cohen <wco...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 01/30/2013 10:58 AM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>>> Will,
>>>
>>> I have made a couple of changes based on the report.
>>> Found a couple of bugs, so that was useful though it
>>> is hard to parse the output even with the dictionary.
>>> I think this comes from the fact that it prints the
>>> steps in the simulation that led to a detected error.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>
>> Hi Stephan,
>>
>> Yes, sometime it is a slog through the output of coverity because of all the 
>> output related to how it figured out there was a problem.  Generally, I read 
>> the top of the error message to see what the error is and then skip to 
>> bottom to see where it is flagged.
>>
>>
>> The results look a bit better in the new libpfm git version.  Attached are 
>> the results for the current git tree.
>>
>> -Will


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
_______________________________________________
perfmon2-devel mailing list
perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel

Reply via email to