David, On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 09:48:58AM -0600, David Nellans wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Stephane Eranian wrote: > > You have to be careful with the versin of libpfm you are using. Due > > to additions of system calls, the perfmon syscalls get bumped and > > if you have a mismatch between what libpfm knows and what the kernel uses > > you get into this situation. > > > > If you tell me which kernel patch you are using I can tell you which libpfm > > to use. > > > are things moving fast enough in development it is worth always using the > newest (.17_rc5 currently) patches/libs/tools or is the libpfm > userspace api remaining fairly stable? and the in kernel api? >
I think it is worth upgrading each time there is a new release because I fix bugs and cleanup the code. As for the user API, I am trying to stabilize it at this point. -- -Stephane _______________________________________________ perfmon mailing list [email protected] http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/perfmon/
