Will, On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 06:23:57PM -0400, William Cohen wrote: > > I haven't looked at the latest mm kernel to see what it has in it. It > seemed like having the patches apply cleanly to Linus' tree was the way to > track the current leading edge of the kernel and minimize problems due to > patches not applying cleanly. > Yes, but for now I am pushing upstream the small patches that modify the general kernel infrastructure. Those are pushed against Linus's tree and Andrew puts them into his tree.
> >>The modified perfmon-base-mod.diff is also attached. It eliminates the > >>kernel name change and an extraneous white space change to kernel/ptrace.c > >> > > > >Ok. Do you have problm with ehe kernel name change. > > Once perfmon gets merged there isn't a need for a name changes. Figured it > was something that wasn't needed for the patches. > Yes. I think I put this in originally because someone asked me for an easy way to differentiate with unpached kernel. I agree that eventually this needs to be removed. -- -Stephane _______________________________________________ perfmon mailing list [email protected] http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/perfmon/
