Hello, On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:28:51PM +0900, azuma?$B!JEl ?$B9'<y!K wrote: > > This patch directly accesses the MMIO registers and sets PM signal groups > for Cell platform. > > My previous patch was modified to correspond to git-tree. > In addition, I changed some coding style and error processing etc. > (no functional change) > > However, this patch doesn't correspond to SMP.
What do you mean here? > Moreover "PPE signal group" is included only this time. > > I posted the patch to cbe_regs.[ch] (as 3of3). > However, the patch is posted to PPC/Cell kernel now. > Ok, so they will eventually show up in the mainline then. I will include the 3 parts in my tree then when patch 3of3 shows up in mainline we'll drop it. This way the perfmon2 tree will compile on Cell right waway. Thanks for your contributions. > 1/2 > The patch replaces rtas_reset_signals() and rtas_activate_signals() > with pfm_cell_reset_signals() and pfm_cell_activate_signals() respectively > according to the platform identification. Moreover, there is a restriction > in the combination in PM signal group of Cell. The pfm_cell_pmc_check() > for the combination check is registered at the same time. > > 2/2 > It is a main body of pfm_cell_reset_signals() and pfm_cell_activate_signals(). > (in the new file: perfmon_cell_signals.c) Moreover, this patch includes > pfm_cell_pmc_check() too. > > Thanks, > > -- Takaki Azuma > _______________________________________________ > perfmon mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/perfmon/ -- -Stephane _______________________________________________ perfmon mailing list [email protected] http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/perfmon/
