Will, On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 12:42:31PM -0400, William Cohen wrote: > >>/// lsmod | grep perfmon output: > >>perfmon_intel_arch 25096 0 > >> > >>/// pfmon -l output > >>UNHALTED_CORE_CYCLES > >>UNHALTED_REFERENCE_CYCLES > >>INSTRUCTIONS_RETIRED > >>LAST_LEVEL_CACHE_REFERENCE > >>LAST_LEVEL_CACHE_MISSES > >>BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS_RETIRED > >>MISPREDICTED_BRANCH_RETIRED > >>LD_BLOCKS > >>SD_DRAINS > >>MISALIGN_MEM_REF > >>SEG_REG_LOADS > >>SSE_PREFETCH > >>SSE_NT_STORES_RETIRED > >>L2_ADS > >>DBUS_BUSY > >>L2_LINES_IN > >>BUS_DRDY_CLOCKS > >>BUS_TRANS_RFO > >> > > Here is the results from the laptop. -Will > > > PMU model detected by pfmlib: Intel Core Duo/Core Solo > number of implemented PMD registers : 2 > implemented PMD registers : [ 0 1 ] > number of available PMD registers : 2 > available PMD registers : [ 0 1 ] > number of implemented PMC registers : 2 > implemented PMC registers : [ 0 1 ] > number of available PMC registers : 2 > available PMC registers : [ 0 1 ] > number of counters : 2 > implemented counters : [ 0 1 ] > number of available counters : 2 > available counters : [ 0 1 ] > hardware counter width : 32 > number of events supported : 18 > > That looks good. So I am not sure I understand the problem.
Have you tried with the latest libpfm I relaeased on 10/17? -- -Stephane _______________________________________________ perfmon mailing list [email protected] http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/perfmon/
