On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 20:02 +0200, Tommi Komulainen wrote:
> While not necessary, I wouldn't be so certain about getting any more
> performance out of GMarkup. I once wrote a silly benchmark for three
> XML parsers (expat, libxml2, GMarkup) using empty callbacks, so any
> time spent is because of the parser (application logic would be
> virtually identical in all cases.)
Sure - whatever ;-)
Either way - I did the port - it only took half an hour or so:
http://go-oo.org/~michael/b-a-s-prof-markup.png
You may notice in comparison with:
http://go-oo.org/~michael/b-a-s-prof-markup.png
That the cycle estimation for main is 41 million vs 115million - I
guess that's a saving worth having; appears to still work ;-) I'll
commit to HEAD ;-)
Regards,
Michael.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
Performance-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/performance-list
