> Indeed constant pointers end up in .data. What I was suggesting > is to get rid of the pointer by for example replacing "const char > *x" by "const char x[4]" where you have a list of two-letter > language tags for example... But you already know that. :)
That sure sounds like a job for the compiler. I don't see why the difference between those two should normally be visible outside the scope. M. _______________________________________________ Performance-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/performance-list
