Boy, do I hate mailing lists that don't adjust Reply-To :-/. On Monday 24 April 2006 14:03, michael meeks wrote: > Hi Tommi, > > On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 13:02 +0300, Tommi Komulainen wrote: > > FWIW that is pretty much for what we have maemo-launcher[1] for :-) > > Sounds nice to me; although I'm not certain what the saving is wrt. the > display & settings structures really.
Hmm, and I thought it was only us who had to resolve to using such hacks. Do you have any numbers on the actual savings? > The real win to me is linking data: of course, to populate that > correctly you need to: > > * set LD_BIND_NOW=1 before 'maemo-launcher' is run (shell script > wrapper or what have you) > > * unset LD_BIND_NOW as you fork each child Yes, there are certainly some things you could learn from kdeinit instead of reinventing the wheel :). > Oh, of course, you want then to link as much as you can into > maemo-launcher before you fork as well; but - anything you can win > beyond that is no doubt interesting too [ icon cache info (?) etc. ] > > > (Ab)using the fact that pretty much all of the time all apps use the > > same theme, same fonts, same environment, etc. we're hacking away with > > Lubos - are KDE apps moving to using linking -pie -rdynamic, or are you > sticking with separate shlibs ? I don't think PIE's are that widely supported these days, so no. What would be the benefits of doing so anyway? -- Lubos Lunak KDE developer --------------------------------------------------------------------- SuSE CR, s.r.o. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] , [EMAIL PROTECTED] Drahobejlova 27 tel: +420 2 9654 2373 190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 2 9654 2374 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/ _______________________________________________ Performance-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/performance-list
