On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 15:03 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 09:32 -0400, Morten Welinder wrote:
> > > 190 GParamBoolean, 8360 bytes
> > ? GParamString ???? bytes
> > 
> > Allocating those dynamically feels wasteful.  It's not
> > as-if they'll change.
> 
>       Presumably the translated _nick and _blurb consume a chunk of memory
> and I/O doing i18n, and have to be dupped; I guess they're only used by
> GUI designer (type) things too. Using a callback / table to map name ->
> pair of i18n strings - that could be done as-needed would be leaner -
> but perhaps there is a solution in-place already for that.
> 

I did a patch for that once; it is in bugzilla somewhere.

_______________________________________________
Performance-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/performance-list

Reply via email to