Hi, On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 20:15 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > > In my testings, this didn't affect the timetext test much > > > > Well, according to these profiles: > > > > http://folks.o-hand.com/jorn/pango-benchmarks/210-softfloat/pango.txt > > http://folks.o-hand.com/jorn/pango-benchmarks/210-softfloat/pango-cairo.txt > > > > your improvement should make a large difference on the 770. I'll try > > to get you numbers, if Xan doesn't beat me to it. > > Yes, and I kicked some of that out on Friday. My statement above was > about this last improvement today, and on x86 only. Numbers for Pango > 1.15.0 vs. 1.15.1 would be interesting. I oprofiled them both today (using the timetext test): http://folks.o-hand.com/~jorn/pango-benchmarks/28-pango-1.15.0/ http://folks.o-hand.com/~jorn/pango-benchmarks/28-pango-1.15.1/ Jorn -- OpenedHand Ltd. http://o-hand.com/ _______________________________________________ Performance-list mailing list Performance-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/performance-list
