On 25 Jan 2007 21:16:23 +0100, Soeren Sandmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Daniel Amelang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > So, the tessellator behavior that you're seeing is interesting and > > deserves some looking into. But I can't help but notice in your > > profiles that g_type_instance_is_a takes up 3x the CPU that the > > tessellator does. And with the old tessellator, g_type_instance_is_a > > takes 9x the CPU the tessellator does. Now, I'm not a GTK guru, and I > > have a lot of confidence in the GTK developers, so what's the story? > > Note that development versions of GTK+ have much more debugging code > turned on which among other things means many more calls to > g_type_instance_is_a(). So be sure to compare apples to apples. (Not > saying you didn't).
Good point. I don't know, these profiles come from Jorn, and only he knows the details behind what was compiled and how (flags, etc). Jorn? Dan _______________________________________________ Performance-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/performance-list
