On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 21:01 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > I'm having some problems with 'currently' applying to ignoring a patch that > improves > performance on 'embedded' platforms for about 4 and a half *years*. For over > a year I've > been trying to bring it to people attention, but somehow it didn't work. Now > after making > 2 hard statements about how hard it is to get patches into gtk+ I suddenly > see 3 people > volunteering to work on it. So, it *has been* productive, whatever you or > vincent may claim. > > I'm not a supporter of being rude, but in this case it helped more than being > polite and > patient.
It's good to see people showing interest on it now, but that doesn't mean you need to be controversial to get that. FWIW, I don't remember hearing about these patches before last week on IRC from you. Nothing like a half years at all. Maybe all you needed was a mention on gtk-devel or performance-list, like you did now. Anyway, good to see this going. Lets focus on the real work now. -- behdad http://behdad.org/ "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 _______________________________________________ Performance-list mailing list Performance-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/performance-list
