On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 05:04:11PM +0200, Mathieu Lonjaret wrote: Hi,
> On 28 May 2018 at 16:52, Mathieu Lonjaret <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 28 May 2018 at 16:22, Mathieu Lonjaret <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >>> I'm not sure about the "missing" 311 images. > > > > wait, I've just realized the answer could be very simple. Did you make > > permanodes for all these files and images? > > the 'is:image' query is looking for permanodes that have a > > camliContent image, not images by themselves. So if you stored these > > 311 images without making permanodes for them, it's normal that the > > index finds them, but that the search query does not. > > To specifically look for file schemas (and see if we do find your > 36974), you can do this instead : > pk search -rawquery '{"constraint": {"camliType": "file"}, "Limit": -1}' ok: $ pk search -rawquery '{"constraint": {"camliType": "file"}, "Limit": -1}' | grep blob | wc -l 31085 $ pk search -rawquery '{"constraint": {"camliType": "permanode"}, "Limit": -1}' | grep blob | wc -l 1065 Not exactly :) Matthias -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Perkeep" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
