I want to store several TB of data in the database. So given that you need 7GB of RAM for about 70GB of blobs, does that mean I would have to assume maybe 100GB RAM usage for 1TB of blobs?
It seems to me like this does not seem to scale. Is this a fundamental problem of Perkeep? Best, Albert On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 3:29:38 PM UTC+1, tgulacsi78 wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > AFAIK the disks can be slow, but plenty (for a home server) of RAM is > needed, > as the metadata index is kept in memory. > > perkeepd consumes about 7GB of RAM for > > Jan 02 15:27:48 tequila perkeepd[7308]: 2019/01/02 15:27:48 index/corpus: > stats: 3354.762 MiB mem: 8111182 blobs (71.815 GiB) (7239923 schema (76206 > permanode, 54526 file (53213 image), ...) > Jan 02 15:27:48 tequila perkeepd[7308]: 2019/01/02 15:27:48 index/corpus: > scanning CPU usage: 3m13.711292s > > Tamás > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > On 2019. January 2., Wednesday 12:56, 'Albert Zeyer' via Perkeep < > [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > > > I would like to run some kind of dedicated hardware/server just for > Perkeep, which both acts as a backup, but also as a data provider to e.g. > access my photos or other things. > > > > Are there suggestions what to run/use? I guess Linux? What file system? > And a hardware RAID? Or software RAID? Or is RAID kind of obsolete with > Perkeep, and I should do the duplication on the Perkeep level? > > > > I would also like to have this in my home, so it should be quiet > (preferably only passive cooling) and consume low energy. > > > > Best regards, > > Albert > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Perkeep" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
