Quoting Lance Wicks (2019-06-04 16:54:41) > GitHub is defacto standard, which pains me as it's very much a > centralisation. But I'd not object.
I'm pretty much in the same spot. That said, I suspect most of the barrier is that the use of the tool is quite different; change ids, having to set up tooling locally... Folks are used to the fork & pr workflow. My gut is that moving to some other platform (either hosted or on our own infrastructure) with a sufficiently similar workflow would drop *most* of the barrier -- GitLab, Gogs/Gitea , etc. are all similar, and generally you can even log in with your GitHub account. But it probably makes more sense to just use GitHub, if for no other reason than the bug tracker is there. I guess part of why I don't have a strong objection despite centralization is I don't really feel like we're locked in to the provider; if GitHub starts doing things we find unacceptable, I don't think it will be too onerous to migrate to a competitor or our own infrastructure. If that starts to change I will start to worry. -Ian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Perkeep" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/perkeep/155968255518.18717.3678717589020754091%40localhost.localdomain. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
