On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 11:23 PM Tristan Kohl <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well I still had no success so far using pk-mount, sha224-xxx remains > empty. > This may be because you're expecting files you added with pk put file to show up there. That's not an unreasonable expectation, but (IIUC) they won't because pk put file uses a different schema for representing files and directories than pk-mount does. For example, I have an image file that I added to Perkeep both ways. The bare bytes have a blobref of 5906a8... in both cases. (As expected.) That ref is embedded in a schema blob that, in the pk put file case (0056f0...), has a lot of unix* attributes (unixOwner, unixPermission, etc.), and in the pk-mount case (9507cd...) does not. The differences continue to accumulate as you move outward to their containers, etc. It would be great if pk-mount could interpret files and directories create with pk put file... Cheers, - Bob Is there any other option for me to just get access to all my files i.e. > some "export" of some sort? > > Cheers, > Tristan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Perkeep" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/perkeep/180adb0c-d532-49c6-bc8e-585e8580d6dc%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/perkeep/180adb0c-d532-49c6-bc8e-585e8580d6dc%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Perkeep" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/perkeep/CAEf8c49d0XHm1dMXhUqwF0GKNs%3DkqtGcVykb6_Os6sOTz6FivQ%40mail.gmail.com.
