On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 02:35:34PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 12/09/2010 02:27 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:19:34PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 12/07/2010 04:57 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>
> >>> If core and vendor are the same as it is in F-14, then it's non-existent
> >>> module looked up twice in the same path without luck.
> >>>
> >>> So, my suggestion is change all modules to install into core directories
> >>> and leave vendorarch empty for personal RPMs, which also cut down time for
> >>> looking up
> >>
> >> How comes, f14 already did so and f15 has stopped doing so?
> >>
> > No, it didn't. See spec files.
>
> The facts speak a clear language.
>
> All f15-built modules now land in %{_libdir}/perl5/vendor_perl instead
> of %{_libdir}/perl5 as they did in f14.
>
You do not differentiate perl symbolic name and and real path. Yes, the files
moved to different directory. No, the symbolic names in spec did not change.I just explain your confusion. I do not say there is no regression in distribution. -- Petr
pgpo51oAYkelX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
