On 02/01/2011 05:09 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 01/31/2011 04:36 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On 01/31/2011 04:21 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: >>> Hello, >>> because some questions and blocked reviews [1]. I feel that we really >>> need discuss our @INC paths once again. >> >> Thanks for trying to launch such a discussion. >> >> I am blocking these reviews, because I feel redhat.cz has drawn >> uncommunicated, arguable and questionable decisions, which are at risk >> of to run down Fedora's perl. >> >>> This is only proposal and there are also other possibilities, how to >>> create specific directory for installation of users rpms. I'd like to >>> change this proposal to FPC guidelines maybe for next Fedora, therefore >>> I really like to know your opinions. >> >> I promise to read it in depth and to think about it, but I won't have >> much time this week. > > Marcela, what are we supposed to think of the fact you are continuing to > accept packages which do not install into vendor_dir? > > I interpret these actions of yours, as you not being interested in > settling the issues, but you wanting to implement facts by brute-force. > > This is not helpful. > > Reviews like this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664817 are also not helpful. Ok, I'll be doing nothing until some decision ;-)
-- Marcela Mašláňová BaseOS team Brno -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
