On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:38:21 +0200
Marcela Mašláňová <mmasl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 03:07 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > On 01/10/10 09:26, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> >> commit 29e9c5e6c9749506b3718757acf3069d1f7bab33
> >> Author: Marcela Mašláňová<mmasl...@redhat.com>
> >> Date: Fri Oct 1 09:25:49 2010 +0200
> >>
> >> Filter *.so at the start of spec.
> >>
> >> perl.spec | 68
> >> +++++++++--------------------------------------------------- 1
> >> files changed, 11 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) ---
> >> diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
> >> index b73be39..3aa9bcc 100644
> >> --- a/perl.spec
> >> +++ b/perl.spec
> >> @@ -6,6 +6,17 @@
> >> %define multilib_64_archs x86_64 s390x ppc64 sparc64
> >> %define parallel_tests 1
> >>
> >> +# internal filter just for this spec
> >> +%define %perl_default_filter %{?filter_setup: %{expand: \
> >> +%filter_provides_in %{perl_vendorarch}/.*\\.so$ \
> >> +%filter_provides_in %{archlib}/.*\\.so$ \
> >> +%filter_provides_in -P %{perl_archlib}/(?!CORE/libperl).*\\.so$ \
> >> +%filter_from_provides /perl(UNIVERSAL)/d; /perl(DB)/d \
> >
> > perl(UNIVERSAL) and perl(DB) shouldn't be filtered from the
> > provides of the main perl package since it actually *does* provide
> > these modules. We currently have the situation in F-15 and Rawhide
> > where various packages claim to provide these but the one that
> > actually does doesn't advertise the fact:
> >
> Thanks, they will be provided in next update.
Thanks; don't forget to fix F-15 too though.
Paul.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
