Ralf Corsepius <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|---                         |NOTABUG
        Last Closed|                            |2016-09-19 07:43:06

--- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius <> ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #0)
> Thus I think the spec file should
> mention "GPL+ or Artistic" in the License tag. Now it declares "Artistic
> 2.0" only.

I do not agree. This perl-dist is clearly licensed Aritistic-2.0 as whole.
The fact contains a "GPL or Artistic" licenced file is irrelevant.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
perl-devel mailing list --
To unsubscribe send an email to

Reply via email to