https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1609221
Tom "spot" Callaway <tcall...@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|NOTABUG |---
Keywords| |Reopened
--- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcall...@redhat.com> ---
Okay, that is a different situation. Copyright has not been abandoned (or
expired) on this work, the author has merely granted a sort of meta-license
which permits for any OSI approved license to be applied.
Technically, "Public Domain" is not an OSI approved license, so it is not a
valid choice (though, I suspect it was the maintainer's attempt to quantify
that weird meta-license).
The easy fix is to change the License field to be something permissive and OSI
approved. I would suggest changing the spec to:
# Technically, the license allows us to choose any OSI approved license, so we
# choose MIT for maximal compatibility.
License: MIT
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EAWH5BKKYNWTE2TA3MYXD32VFC6TK54K/
