Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: RPM description is not descriptive

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811144

           Summary: RPM description is not descriptive
           Product: Fedora
           Version: 17
          Platform: Unspecified
        OS/Version: Unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: low
          Priority: unspecified
         Component: perl-Class-ISA
        AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com
        ReportedBy: t...@tim-landscheidt.de
         QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
                CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com,
                    mmasl...@redhat.com, ppi...@redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora
      Story Points: ---
              Type: Bug
        Regression: ---
        Mount Type: ---
     Documentation: ---


Description of problem:

The RPM description doesn't describe the package.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

0.36-1005.fc16


How reproducible:

Always :-).


Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -qi perl-Class-ISA

Actual results:

| Suppose you have a class (like Food::Fish::Fishstick) that is derived, via
| its @ISA, from one or more superclasses (as Food::Fish::Fishstick is from
| Food::Fish, Life::Fungus, and Chemicals), and some of those superclasses
| may themselves each be derived, via its @ISA, from one or more superclasses
| (as above).

(That's all.)


Expected results:

Something understandable.


Additional info:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Reply via email to