music commented on the pull-request: `Drop i686 support (leaf package)` that
you are following:
``
> There are more transitive reverse dependencies:
Oof, good catch, thanks. I forgot to account for the fact that `ExcludeArch`
reverse dependencies “prune the tree,” but problems can “pass through” `noarch`
reverse dependencies. Even knowing this, it’s hard to be sure one has
constructed the correct set of queries…
> llhttp ExclusiveArch: %{nodejs_arches}
The good news is that `llhttp` uses `licensecheck` to double-check the
dev-dependencies bundle it uses for transpiling TypeScript to C. This is a
useful guard against oversights in packaging, but it doesn’t affect the
contents of the binary RPMs. I can just skip this check on `i686` rather than
having to deal with `llhttp`’s reverse dependency tree.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/llhttp/pull-request/32
> copr-rpmbuild/copr-builder
I’ll work on a PR for this too.
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-re-engine-RE2/pull-request/2
--
_______________________________________________
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
