https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152319
Paul Howarth <p...@city-fan.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |p...@city-fan.org
--- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth <p...@city-fan.org> ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #6)
> You are right that the patch is wrong. The only slnames that need a
> correction are the LGPL's. I think more appropriate place for a dependency
> on Software::License is Module::Build rather then Module::Starter.
That's what I thought too but it might introduce bootstrapping issues, with the
bootstrap Module::Build not having the dependency and the dual-lived one
subsequently introducing it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=a7DCQsvhov&a=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
