On 3 December 2010 14:43, Shlomi Fish <shlo...@iglu.org.il> wrote: > On Friday 03 December 2010 15:25:14 demerphq wrote: >> On 3 December 2010 13:49, Shlomi Fish <shlo...@iglu.org.il> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > after I posted my series of patches to perlipc.pod , I saw that tchrist >> > posted his version, which got accepted immediately. As a downside to >> > that, I'll have to restart my work. However, I noticed that perlipc.pod >> > still has many >> >> > perceived issues. Here is a list of things I noticed: >> >> Shlomi, why didnt you send this to tchrist, and cc p5p? >> > > Don't know - didn't think about it. I assumed he would see my posting as he > saw my previous posts about the perlipc.pod revamp. I'm CCing him here. > >> Dont expect Tom to see your posting. > > OK, why shouldn't I? He saw the previious posts.
Because he may or may not be too busy to notice. And it is simple courtesy as you know he is the author, and has strong feelings about his document. Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"
